TaskWork + Asana
Asana implementation with governance, adoption and clear acceptance criteria.
For teams moving from scattered work to a structured operation: assessment, architecture, supported rollout and acceptance criteria at every stage.
Implementation path
Map processes, volumes and owners
Design portfolios, templates and fields
Migrate live work and validate with a pilot
Publish the standard and measure adoption
Requirements gathering
Configuration
Stabilization
Deliverables
What is in place at the end
An implementation ends when a standard has an owner, not when the tool is configured.
What is managed in Asana and what is not
We draw the boundary with the ERP, the CRM and the spreadsheets, so the tool does not compete with the systems that already work.
Portfolios and projects with an owner
Every level gets an owner, an update cycle and required fields, so reporting comes out of the operation instead of a manual consolidation.
Closing criteria per stage
No stage closes without real users working inside the standard and without the agreed indicators running.
Stages
From the first meeting to a published standard
Four stages, each with its own deliverable and an explicit closing criterion, so progress does not depend on perception.
We map processes, volumes, owners and current integrations, and record the assumptions that can change the scope.
We turn that map into a portfolio hierarchy, project templates, custom fields, rules and tracking dashboards.
We build the environment, migrate work in progress and validate with a pilot group before opening general access.
We publish the standard, train the owners and adjust it based on what the live operation reveals in the first cycles.
Decision without empty promises
The page sells clarity and method, not loose numbers. Public references guide the conversation, but outcomes depend on real context.
Before you start
What is worth defining before configuring anything
How long does an implementation take?
It depends on the number of areas, the volume of work in progress and the integrations. The assessment gives a range with explicit assumptions, not a loose date.
Do we have to migrate the whole history?
Almost never worth it. We migrate live work and keep the history for reference, so we do not drag along structures nobody uses.
What if the team does not adopt the tool?
That is the main risk. This is why the rollout is validated with a pilot group and adoption is measured per area before each stage closes.
Put your implementation to the test before building it
Bring a real process and leave with scope, the sequence of stages and the risks worth covering first.
Assess your Asana implementation in an objective assessment.
TaskWork helps turn the conversation into priorities, operating design and next steps in Asana.